Suppliers Need to Argue their Case in the Face of the Smart Export Guarantee

On 10 June 2019, the Government lay legislation introducing a new supplier-led, subsidy-free Smart Export Guarantee (SEG). The SEG is designed to replace the Feed-in Tariffs scheme which was discontinued in March 2019. This transition to a Smart Export Guarantee is part of the Conservative vision that ‘electricity generation should be competitive, and market based.’[1]  However, whilst a replacement for the Feed-in Tariff scheme is needed, there are gaps in the scheme that could potentially leave suppliers at a disadvantage. Suppliers may want to act now to urge the Government to rethink elements of the SEG and make sure the tools are in place for a smooth transition.

The SEG could create a postcode lottery for suppliers

The lack of minimum price[2] means that suppliers’ costs are entirely dependent on external factors. This could put suppliers at a competitive disadvantage based on the region they’re in. Areas with high demand, fewer small-scale generators and high consumer energy use, will result in suppliers paying more for energy imports. Lobbying the Government for a flat rate fee would help ensure consistency throughout the country.

The SEG introduction may place further pressure on energy infrastructure

Unlike Feed-in Tariffs, the Smart Export Guarantee is dependent on the generator having a functioning smart meter. Suppliers will therefore face further pressure to speed up the roll out. As there is no guarantee that the supplier purchasing the energy is the same as the supplier responsible for providing the smart meter, suppliers wishing to purchase energy could be dependent on another supplier installing the smart meter. This raises the possibility of energy going to waste while generators wait for installation to be completed. To ensure a smooth transition, suppliers may want to consider lobbying for the SEG to begin after the smart meter rollout has been completed when the necessary infrastructure is in place.

Government has an incentive to listen

By removing the income guarantee of the Feed-in Tariffs, there is little incentive for people to adopt new, early stage, sustainable technologies as the Government wants. Early stage technology is unlikely to be competitive meaning the generator will receive less (if any) income. This could affect renewable deployment, undermining policymakers’ ambitions. Suppliers could succeed with a lobbying effort built on a message of ensuring a diverse future energy mix, as the risks to the Government’s plans from not listening may provide enough leverage to ensure a full hearing.

[1] Chris Skidmore MP, Hansard, 10 June 2019, Vol.661 WS, Link.

[2] Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, The future for small-scale low carbon generation: Smart Export Guarantee – government response, 11 June 2019, Link.



What the Energy Security Strategy tells us about the Government’s current priorities

After several weeks of reported delays, disagreements and leaks, the Government has finally published its Energy Security Strategy. Crucially, the Strategy provides us with an insight into the main influences and influencers of this Government. With the next general election a mere two years away, the Prime Minister appears to be moving away from the climate focus seen at COP26. Instead focusing on internal party politics and maintaining support within the Conservative . Below, Brevia has unpacked some of the telling signs of what is currently influencing Government direction on energy policy.

Read More »

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will impact UK energy policy

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has changed the world. The ways it has done so are yet to be fully understood. Many of our post Cold War assumptions have been upended: Germany has abandoned its longstanding policy of maintaining a limited armed forces to commit €100 billion to defence spending; Switzerland has departed from its historical neutrality to apply sanctions to Russia; Finland is now openly discussing NATO membership and things we had assumed would never happen continue to do so on a daily basis. Set against the human tragedy that is unfolding in Ukraine, these events can seem small or insignificant in comparison. Nonetheless, they are likely to have enduring consequences for everyone in Europe. Particularly when it comes to how Europe, including the UK, powers itself.

Read More »

What did the White Paper tell us about the Levelling Up Agenda?

Last week, the Government published its long-awaited Levelling Up White Paper. The White Paper goes some way to answering the vexed question of ‘What is levelling up?’, by setting out twelve missions the Government hopes to accomplish by 2030. In addition, the Paper sets out a framework for extending devolution in England which could increase the transparency of the process. However, new funding commitments are thin on the ground, and critics suggest the Government has not provided enough money for Levelling Up to succeed.

Read More »
  • Get in touch to arrange your free monitoring trial.