The SNP’s Waiting Game

The SNP’s hope is that Brexit can swing public opinion towards independence. Scottish politics since the 2014 referendum can be defined as a stalemate over the central constitutional question, but the SNP is hoping that Brexit can break this pattern.

For those living and working south of the border, it is easy to forget the extent to which Scottish politics is linked to the independence question. The SNP, despite having spent 11 years in power, poll at an impressive 43 per cent, just shy of the 44 per cent who voted for independence in 2014. Meanwhile, unionist votes are shared primarily between Labour and the Conservatives. When it comes to a second independence referendum, polls point towards a very similar result to 2014. A narrow, but comfortable vote to remain in the UK. All these figures have been largely consistent since the 2014 independence referendum.

The vote for Brexit and subsequent negotiations has so far not provided the pro-independence swing expected by some commentators. Soon after the Brexit referendum, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon became increasingly vocal about the need for a second independence referendum. This was underpinned by the logic that Scottish voters, who voted 62 per cent to Remain, would resent being dragged out of the EU and Single Market against their will. Instead, support for independence has remained at a stable level: 44 per cent of Scots currently support independence, exactly the same proportion who voted ‘Yes’ in 2014. [1]

This had led to greater caution from Sturgeon. She does not want to lead the SNP into a doomed campaign, against the wishes of more radical elements of the nationalist movement who see the pretext of Brexit as the best chances of success.

At the same time Sturgeon is not agitating for a second EU referendum. Conscious of the 36 per cent of SNP voters who also voted for Brexit [2], she is not willing to alienate supporters ahead of the Scottish Parliament elections by actively pressing for a re-run of the EU vote. Although she has said that SNP MPs would vote for a second referendum if given the chance, that is very different to actively campaigning to make such a vote happen.

Sturgeon may also be making the private calculation, as others have openly, that a bad Brexit would be good for the independence movement. Should Scotland feel the effects of no deal or a poor deal, the theory is that the independence movement would pick up voters who once saw the UK as a secure place for Scotland and its economy. Sunday Times polling has shown that a no-deal Brexit would shift public opinion towards independence, with 48 per cent of Scots saying they would back independence in that scenario. Of course, the converse may prove true. The lived experience of a no deal Brexit may warn voters against another constitutional upheaval.

Rather than immediately commit to one course of action the SNP plan is to wait. As one commentator recently observed, ‘Scottish political opinion is a story of continuity rather than change.’ The SNP and its leader hope that Brexit will disrupt that.

[1] 7 October 2018, The Times, link

[2] Scottish Herald, 7 December 2016, link



What the Energy Security Strategy tells us about the Government’s current priorities

After several weeks of reported delays, disagreements and leaks, the Government has finally published its Energy Security Strategy. Crucially, the Strategy provides us with an insight into the main influences and influencers of this Government. With the next general election a mere two years away, the Prime Minister appears to be moving away from the climate focus seen at COP26. Instead focusing on internal party politics and maintaining support within the Conservative . Below, Brevia has unpacked some of the telling signs of what is currently influencing Government direction on energy policy.

Read More »

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine will impact UK energy policy

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has changed the world. The ways it has done so are yet to be fully understood. Many of our post Cold War assumptions have been upended: Germany has abandoned its longstanding policy of maintaining a limited armed forces to commit €100 billion to defence spending; Switzerland has departed from its historical neutrality to apply sanctions to Russia; Finland is now openly discussing NATO membership and things we had assumed would never happen continue to do so on a daily basis. Set against the human tragedy that is unfolding in Ukraine, these events can seem small or insignificant in comparison. Nonetheless, they are likely to have enduring consequences for everyone in Europe. Particularly when it comes to how Europe, including the UK, powers itself.

Read More »

What did the White Paper tell us about the Levelling Up Agenda?

Last week, the Government published its long-awaited Levelling Up White Paper. The White Paper goes some way to answering the vexed question of ‘What is levelling up?’, by setting out twelve missions the Government hopes to accomplish by 2030. In addition, the Paper sets out a framework for extending devolution in England which could increase the transparency of the process. However, new funding commitments are thin on the ground, and critics suggest the Government has not provided enough money for Levelling Up to succeed.

Read More »
  • Get in touch to arrange your free monitoring trial.